After a long day of attending research groups and seminars, I decided to treat myself to a beer before attending the community panel on the documentary “The Interrupters.” Berkeley was buzzing with its usual mix of characters – students, teenagers, scholars, artist-types and the such. All milling about, filling up the cafes and restaurants. I’m taking in the scene, sort of dreamily wondering how I fit in to this crazy fabric of people in this crazy city in this crazy world. I was tired, just wanted to find a place to escape to for a few, settle my thoughts and sip on something cold and frothy. I eye a bar I’ve never visited and make my way over. It was a dimly lit old-fashioned bar on Shattuck, a ways from campus so less students and more Berkeley locals and workers. I’m feeling nice, the IPA is doing what it does and I’m unwinding – exactly what I had in mind. Then, without notice my short-lived, barley-induced euphoria is interrupted by the sound of a big-bellied, loud-mouthed corporate type hanging out with his blue-collar, Scotch-drinkin pals (weird I know, but thats Berkeley for you). The topic of conversation, it just so happened, was education. “Do you wanna know how to fix any fucking public school in this country??,” the man arrogantly, loudly, and rhetorically asked. You walk in, fire anybody who has a degree from a School of Ed!” Wow, word? Really? An all out attack on the very institution I’ve just agreed to devote the foreseeable future to. To me, this represented nothing less than an outright dismissal of teaching as a practice, of pedagogy, of the complexity of teaching in the face of poverty and inequality, a denial of the systematic attack on the institution of public education. I felt like he punched my right in the stomach. So much for relaxing with a brew, my nerves were rattled. I contemplated giving dude a piece of my mind (think matt damon in good will hunting type of confrontation) but my mind was full of theoretical education jargon and would have probably done little for the cause, so I paid the bill and set off to the panel, trying to take the L gracefully. As I left the bar, the sun had set and my mind was racing as I walked back down Shattuck Ave. How do I defend, explain or justify myself, my career, and my vision? It was with this frame of mind that I stepped into the auditorium where the panel speaking on the movie “The Interrupters” was being held. Peep the trailer…
The panel was a trip. It was hosted by the School of Education along with the School of Social Welfare, the School of Public Health and the School of Journalism. The panelists were faculty from those schools along with the writer and producer of the film, and a principal of an Oakland public middle school. The audience was less academic, and more community-based. Teachers, community youth groups from Richmond and Oakland, social workers, and other concerned citizens comprised most of the audience. Audience members were encouraged to chime in, and that they did. The tone was tense as Oakland has gone through a recent spade of murders. An angry (white) woman stood up and practically screamed at the audience demanding an answer to her question, “How many of YOU ALL have personally experienced violence??!!” Followed with, “I”m fucking sick and tired of do-gooders trying to make change, if you haven’t even been afflicted by this violence we are talking about!!!!” Her rant stunk of insincerity and boastfulness, somebody desperate for validation. Maybe she thought she needed to appear tough, weathered and wounded because she was white. Maybe she was just crazy, or misguided and really believed her own bullshit. Apparently even my professor who is from the Gardens (notorious projects in Chicago that come up in the film) was not “street” enough to be doing the work he was doing – her rant and others throughout the evening seemed to incriminate anyone in a position of power trying to affect social change as pretentious. So, let me get this right. On the one hand we are trying to end the violence and promote the peace but on the other we are penalizing people who cannot boast of violence in their pasts (the prof from the Gardens admitted he was not a “tough guy” despite growing up in the projects). Still shaken up from the bar incident, I began to inwardly reflect – is my future as a writer, teacher, scholar and activist doomed because I didn’t gang-bang in my youth, because I didn’t grow up in the hood, because I can’t roll up my trousers and exhibit a bullet wound? Do I need to remind people that I was born in war-torn Iran and many in my extended family are political prisoners, martyrs of the Iran-Iraq war, or that my dad used to take me on the roof of our Tehran apartment to watch the night sky light up from US-backed rockets launched from Saddam Hussein’s Iraq? Would that make me more suitable for work in poor communities? Is THAT relevant to the discussion I am entering about public education in Oakland?? No, it’s not. People walk different paths – I refuse to apologize for my parents busting their chops, earning a middle class status and giving me the opportunity to live a violent-free, intellectually rich childhood. And I will not pretend that the chaos, and desperation of the country I hail from somehow gives me some credibility in working in underprivileged communities in the United States. It does not. The work I do, the ideas I will develop and the person I am becoming, will themselves give me the legitimacy and credibility to do the work I intend to do. I guess I better get used to the haters – I have a feeling there will be many on this new path I am embarking on.







